7 Commission Structure Examples to Maximize Sales in 2025

Designing a sales commission plan isn't just about paying your team; it's a strategic tool that directly shapes behavior, drives revenue, and aligns individual goals with company targets. An effective structure can ignite motivation and attract top talent, while a poorly designed one can lead to confusion, high turnover, and missed quotas. This is especially true when your compensation model must work in harmony with your core product value; the right commission plan should directly reflect and reinforce your chosen SaaS pricing strategies to ensure profitability and scalability.

This guide breaks down 7 distinct commission structure examples, moving beyond surface-level descriptions to provide deep strategic analysis. We will explore the mechanics, pros, cons, and ideal use cases for each model.

You'll get actionable takeaways to help you select and implement a compensation plan that fuels sustainable growth and rewards performance effectively. Whether you're building a sales team from scratch or refining an existing plan, these examples provide a blueprint for creating a structure that works for your unique business goals. We'll examine everything from simple straight-line commissions to more complex residual and tiered models, giving you the insights needed to make an informed decision.

1. Straight Commission

The Straight Commission model is a pure, performance-based compensation structure. In this system, a sales representative's earnings come entirely from a fixed percentage of the sales they generate, with no base salary or guaranteed income. It's one of the most straightforward and transparent commission structure examples, directly linking financial reward to sales performance.

This model is prevalent in industries with high-ticket items and long sales cycles where individual performance can be clearly measured. For instance, a real estate agent earning a 3% commission on a $500,000 home sale receives $15,000, while a SaaS salesperson might earn 20% on new annual contracts.

Strategic Analysis

The primary advantage of straight commission is its power to motivate. It attracts highly driven, confident salespeople who thrive on performance-based rewards. For the business, it minimizes fixed payroll costs, as compensation is only paid out when revenue is generated, making it a low-risk model for startups or companies entering new markets.

However, this high-risk, high-reward structure can also create a volatile, high-pressure environment, potentially leading to high employee turnover. It may also discourage non-sales activities like team collaboration, training, and long-term customer relationship building if those tasks don't lead to an immediate commission.

Actionable Takeaways

To implement a straight commission structure effectively, founders and product teams should:

• Set Competitive Rates: Research industry benchmarks to offer a commission percentage that attracts top talent. Rates can vary widely, from 2-3% for real estate to over 20% for certain software sales.
• Provide Robust Support: Since there's no safety net, you must equip your team for success. This includes comprehensive product training, high-quality leads, marketing materials, and a powerful CRM system.
• Align with Profitability: Ensure your commission rates are sustainable and directly align with your product's profit margins. For a deeper dive, review this guide on how to calculate commission percentages on refgrow.com.
• Consider a Draw: Offer a "draw against commission," which is an advance payment that reps pay back from their future earnings. This can provide financial stability during onboarding or slow sales periods.

2. Base Salary Plus Commission

The Base Salary Plus Commission model is a hybrid compensation structure that balances security with incentive. Sales professionals receive a guaranteed base salary, providing a stable income floor, supplemented by a commission paid out as a percentage of the sales they generate. This is one of the most widely adopted commission structure examples, offering a middle ground between pure performance pay and a fixed salary.

This structure is dominant in industries where both sales activities and non-revenue-generating tasks are crucial. For example, a B2B SaaS salesperson at a company like Salesforce might have a $75,000 base salary and earn a 10% commission on new contracts, while a medical device representative will have a similar structure to compensate for extensive training and relationship management duties.

The following bar chart illustrates the typical split between fixed and variable pay in this model.

As visualized, the base salary typically constitutes the majority of total target compensation, ensuring stability for the sales team.

Strategic Analysis

The primary strength of this model is its ability to attract and retain a broader range of sales talent. The guaranteed salary provides financial security, reducing the high-pressure environment of straight commission and lowering employee turnover. This security allows reps to focus on longer sales cycles and invest time in non-commissionable but vital activities like customer onboarding, team collaboration, and professional development.

However, the fixed cost of salaries means higher overhead for the business compared to a pure commission plan. There's also a risk of complacency; if the base salary is too high, it might reduce the motivation to aggressively pursue new sales. Finding the optimal balance between base and commission is a critical and ongoing challenge for management.

Actionable Takeaways

To effectively implement a base salary plus commission structure, founders and sales leaders should:

• Balance the Compensation Ratio: Aim for a base salary that makes up 60-80% of the total target compensation (TTC). This ensures security while keeping the variable commission component significant enough to motivate performance.
• Set Clear Quotas: Commission eligibility should be tied to achieving a specific sales quota. This protects the company from paying commissions on underperformance and clearly defines success for the sales team.
• Implement Commission Tiers: Introduce accelerators or tiered rates for exceeding quotas. For example, increase the commission percentage from 10% to 15% for all sales generated after a representative hits 110% of their target.
• Define a "Commissionable Sale": Clearly outline the exact criteria for a sale to qualify for commission. Specify details like payment terms, contract signing, and clawback policies for cancelled deals to prevent disputes.

3. Tiered Commission Structure

The Tiered Commission model is a progressive compensation system designed to incentivize exceptional performance by increasing a salesperson's commission rate as they achieve higher sales volumes. Unlike a flat rate, this structure introduces specific sales thresholds, or tiers, and rewards reps with a higher percentage for surpassing each one. This approach is one of the most powerful commission structure examples for driving continuous growth.

This model is frequently used in industries where motivating sales reps to push beyond their base quotas is critical. For instance, a SaaS company might offer 8% on sales up to $100k, 12% on sales between $100k and $200k, and 15% on all revenue generated above $200k. Similarly, automotive dealerships often use tiered commissions based on the number of units sold per month to motivate their teams.

Strategic Analysis

The key advantage of a tiered commission structure is its ability to motivate the entire sales team, not just the top performers. It provides a clear and achievable path for mid-level reps to increase their earnings, creating a powerful incentive to exceed their targets. This "gamified" approach can foster a competitive yet aspirational sales culture. For the business, it aligns compensation costs directly with higher revenue attainment, ensuring that increased payouts are funded by exceptional results.

However, poorly designed tiers can backfire. If the thresholds are set too high, they can demotivate reps who feel the next level is unattainable. Conversely, if tiers are too easy to reach, the structure loses its motivational impact and can inflate compensation costs without a corresponding surge in performance. It can also lead to "sandbagging," where reps hold deals until the next commission period to ensure they hit a higher tier.

Actionable Takeaways

To effectively implement a tiered commission structure, founders and sales leaders should:

• Set Realistic Tiers: Analyze historical sales data to establish challenging yet achievable thresholds. The goal is to stretch your team, not discourage them.
• Create Meaningful Jumps: Ensure the percentage increase between tiers is significant enough to be a real motivator. A jump of 2-4% is often effective at encouraging the extra effort needed to reach the next level.
• Provide Real-Time Visibility: Equip your sales team with dashboards that track their progress toward the next tier in real time. This constant visibility keeps motivation high throughout the sales period.
• Define Time Periods Clearly: Use quarterly or annual periods for your tiers. This prevents reps from manipulating deal timing and encourages consistent performance over the long term rather than just month-end rushes.

4. Draw Against Commission

The Draw Against Commission model offers a compromise between the stability of a salary and the high-incentive nature of a pure commission plan. In this system, sales representatives receive a regular advance payment, or "draw," which provides a predictable income. This draw is then paid back from the commissions they earn in the future, effectively acting as a loan against future performance.

This structure is one of the most practical commission structure examples for roles with long or unpredictable sales cycles. For example, a new SaaS salesperson might receive a $4,000 monthly draw for their first six months. If they earn $10,000 in commission in month seven, they would receive $6,000, with the remaining $4,000 "paying back" that month's draw.

Strategic Analysis

The key advantage of a draw system is its ability to attract and retain talent in high-risk, long-cycle sales environments. It provides new hires with a financial safety net during their ramp-up period, reducing the pressure and turnover often associated with straight commission roles. For the business, it keeps salespeople motivated by performance incentives while mitigating the risk of them leaving before closing major deals.

However, this model introduces financial complexity and risk. If a salesperson consistently fails to earn enough commission to cover their draw, the company accumulates a "draw debt" that may be difficult or impossible to recover. This can also lead to de-motivation if an employee feels they are constantly working just to pay back the company, with no hope of earning significant take-home pay.

Actionable Takeaways

To effectively implement a draw against commission structure, founders and sales leaders should:

• Define Draw Terms Clearly: State in the employment contract whether the draw is recoverable (the employee owes any deficit upon leaving) or non-recoverable. This clarity prevents legal and morale issues down the line.
• Set Realistic Draw Amounts: The draw should be a livable wage but not so high that it de-incentivizes performance. A common practice is to set it at 50-70% of the salesperson's on-target earnings (OTE).
• Establish a Time Limit: Use the draw as a temporary bridge, not a permanent solution. Implement it for a fixed period, such as the first 3-6 months for onboarding or during a specific seasonal downturn.
• Conduct Regular Performance Reviews: Closely monitor the performance of reps on a draw. If they aren't on track to earn out their draw after a reasonable period, it requires immediate intervention and a performance improvement plan. Managing these plans is a core part of successful sales team leadership, which is explored further in guides on managing affiliate and sales programs on refgrow.com.

5. Gross Margin Commission

The Gross Margin Commission model is a sophisticated compensation structure where earnings are calculated based on the profit generated from a sale, rather than the total revenue. This approach directly ties a salesperson's income to the company's profitability, shifting their focus from simply closing deals to closing profitable deals. It's one of the most strategically aligned commission structure examples for businesses with variable costs.

This model is ideal for industries where salespeople have control over pricing and discounting. For example, a distributor selling industrial equipment with fluctuating wholesale costs might pay commission on the final sale price minus the cost of goods sold (COGS). Similarly, a custom software development agency could calculate commission based on the project price less the direct costs of developer hours and resources.

Strategic Analysis

The primary advantage of the Gross Margin Commission model is its ability to protect and even enhance profitability. It incentivizes salespeople to sell on value instead of price, discouraging deep, margin-eroding discounts. For the business, this aligns the sales team's personal financial goals directly with the company's bottom-line health, creating a culture of profitable growth.

However, this structure requires a high degree of transparency regarding product costs and margins, which some companies are hesitant to share. It can also be more complex to calculate and administer than revenue-based models. If not managed carefully, it might lead to sales reps avoiding lower-margin but strategically important products or customer segments.

Actionable Takeaways

To implement a gross margin commission structure effectively, founders and product teams should:

• Provide Clear Cost Visibility: Sales reps need access to accurate, real-time data on COGS to understand the profitability of a potential deal. A robust CRM or ERP system is essential for this.
• Set Margin Thresholds: Establish clear guidelines on minimum acceptable profit margins for any given deal. This prevents reps from selling products at a loss just to make a small commission.
• Train on Value Selling: Equip your team with the skills to justify premium pricing and articulate the value of your solution. Focus on training that moves conversations away from price and toward ROI and long-term benefits.
• Use Pricing and Quoting Tools: Implement configure, price, quote (CPQ) software that provides guardrails for discounting. This can automate margin calculations and ensure all quotes remain within profitable boundaries.

6. Quota-Based Commission

The Quota-Based Commission model is a performance-driven structure where a sales representative's earnings are directly tied to achieving a specific sales target, or quota. In this system, commissions are often not paid out until the quota is met, or the commission rate increases significantly after the target is reached. This is one of the most common commission structure examples used to ensure a baseline level of performance from the sales team.

This model is a staple in industries where performance can be clearly benchmarked and forecasted. For instance, an enterprise SaaS salesperson might have a quarterly quota of $150,000 in new Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) to unlock their commission. Similarly, a medical device representative may have a territory quota for a certain number of units sold per month.

Strategic Analysis

The primary benefit of a quota-based system is its ability to set clear, unambiguous performance standards for the entire sales force. It aligns individual sales activities directly with broader company revenue goals, ensuring that the team is focused on hitting key business targets. This structure also helps in identifying both high-performing and underperforming reps, making performance management more straightforward.

However, a poorly set quota can be highly demotivating. If targets are perceived as unrealistic or unattainable, it can lead to burnout and high turnover. It can also create a "feast or famine" income cycle for reps, where they might go months without commission, followed by a large payout, which can be stressful and unpredictable.

Actionable Takeaways

To effectively implement a quota-based commission structure, founders and sales leaders should:

• Set Realistic Quotas: Base quotas on historical sales data, market potential, and territory analysis. The goal should be for roughly 60-70% of the team to consistently hit their target to keep it challenging yet achievable.
• Implement Accelerators: Motivate over-performance by offering "accelerators," which are higher commission rates for sales generated after the quota is met. For example, the rate could jump from 10% to 15% on all revenue above the target.
• Provide Ramp-Up Periods: For new hires, implement a ramped quota that gradually increases over their first few months. This gives them time to learn the product and build a pipeline without the pressure of a full quota from day one.
• Ensure Quota Transparency: Clearly communicate how quotas are calculated and have a fair process for adjustments if market conditions or territory assignments change. This builds trust and ensures the system is perceived as equitable.

7. Residual Commission Structure

The Residual Commission model rewards salespeople not just for the initial sale but for the long-term value a customer brings. In this system, a representative earns ongoing commissions from repeat business, renewals, or recurring revenue generated by their original sales efforts. This approach transforms the sales role from a transactional one into a long-term partnership, aligning a rep's income with customer retention and satisfaction.

This model is a cornerstone of industries built on recurring revenue. For example, a SaaS salesperson might earn 15% on the initial annual contract and then 5% on every subsequent annual renewal. Similarly, insurance agents often receive a commission each time a client renews their policy, creating a stable, predictable income stream over time.

Strategic Analysis

The core benefit of residual commission is its focus on customer lifetime value (LTV). It incentivizes reps to acquire high-quality customers who are likely to stick around, rather than just closing deals quickly. This directly combats customer churn and fosters a healthier, more sustainable revenue base for the business. It also significantly increases the earning potential for top-performing reps, acting as a powerful tool for retention.

However, this structure can create complexity in tracking and payouts, requiring a robust system to manage ongoing commissions accurately. It can also lead to a potential drop in new business acquisition if reps become too comfortable managing their existing book of business. This makes balancing the initial commission with the residual percentage a critical strategic decision.

Actionable Takeaways

To implement a residual commission structure successfully, founders and product teams should:

• Balance Initial and Residual Rates: Offer an attractive upfront commission to drive new business, paired with a smaller but meaningful residual commission to encourage retention. For example, a 20% initial commission with a 5% residual.
• Set Declining Tiers: Consider a tiered residual model where the percentage decreases over time (e.g., Year 1: 10%, Year 2: 5%, Year 3+: 2%). This keeps the long-term costs manageable while still rewarding longevity.
• Establish Clear "Clawback" Policies: Define the terms for when residual payments cease, such as when a customer churns or if the sales rep leaves the company. This prevents payout disputes and protects the business.
• Align with Business Goals: This approach is one of many commission structure examples that can be adapted. For a deeper look into similar long-term payout strategies, explore these revenue sharing models on refgrow.com.

Commission Structure Comparison Matrix

Putting It All Together: Your Next Steps

We've journeyed through a comprehensive landscape of commission structure examples, moving from the straightforward appeal of straight commission to the long-term strategic power of a residual model. The core lesson is clear: your commission plan is not just a payroll function; it is a powerful lever for shaping behavior, driving specific business outcomes, and building a motivated, high-performing team. A poorly chosen structure can demotivate top performers and misalign incentives, while a strategically designed plan can become your most significant growth catalyst.

The examples detailed in this article, from tiered commissions that encourage over-performance to gross margin models that prioritize profitability, serve as a strategic blueprint. The goal isn't to copy a model verbatim but to dissect its mechanics and understand its underlying purpose. Each structure tells a story about what a business values most, whether it's new customer acquisition, long-term retention, or profitable deals.

Your Blueprint for Action

The path forward requires introspection and strategic planning. Don't rush this critical decision. Use the insights from this article to guide your process with these actionable next steps:

1. Define Your Primary Goal: What is the single most important outcome you need your sales or affiliate program to achieve right now? Is it rapid market penetration, maximizing customer lifetime value (LTV), or improving deal profitability? Your answer will immediately narrow down the most suitable commission structures.

2. Analyze Your Sales Cycle & Business Model: A short, transactional sales cycle in a high-volume business might thrive on a straight commission plan. Conversely, a SaaS business with a long sales cycle and a focus on recurring revenue will find greater success with a base salary plus commission or a residual commission structure.

3. Model the Financial Impact: Before rolling out any plan, run the numbers. Use a spreadsheet to model different scenarios. What happens during a slow month? What does an exceptional quarter look like for both the company and the representative? This ensures financial viability and prevents unforeseen payroll crises.

4. Prioritize Clarity and Simplicity: The best commission plans are easily understood. If your team needs a complex formula and a calculator to figure out their earnings, the structure is too complicated. This complexity creates confusion and distrust, undermining the very motivation you aim to inspire.

The Strategic Advantage of the Right Structure

Ultimately, mastering these commission structure examples gives you a competitive edge. It allows you to attract and retain the right talent, align every team member with your core business objectives, and build a predictable engine for revenue growth. It transforms compensation from a mere expense into a strategic investment in your company's future. The right plan creates a powerful feedback loop where individual success directly fuels company growth, creating a shared sense of purpose and a culture of performance. As your business evolves, remember to revisit and recalibrate your plan to ensure it remains a powerful tool for your continued success.

Ready to implement a powerful, automated commission structure for your own affiliate or referral program? Refgrow allows you to build and launch a fully native, in-app partner program with just one line of code, supporting everything from tiered rewards to residual payouts. See how you can build your growth engine today at Refgrow.